Doe v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JANE DOE, et al., Case No. 23-cv-05218-AMO 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO 10 THE RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL STRIKE COMPANY, L.L.C., et al., 11 Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is Marriott International, Inc. and The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, 14 LLC’s motion to dismiss and motion to strike. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision 15 without legal argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1-(b). This Order assumes familiarity with the facts…