Legal Opinion

Ryan Alexander Brown v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 2016No. S-15-0264PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice,

[¶1] After being found guilty of conspiracy to commit first-degree murder, Ryan Alexander Brown claims the trial court committed errors when it allowed the State to introduce evidence in the form of a demonstrative video, a bank statement, and W.R.E. 404(b) evidence. We will affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] Mr. Brown presents three issues for our review:

1. [Brown] was denied due process when the trial court allowed the state to play a video of an explosion of a “pipe bomb” when that video was not timely provided to defense counsel and was irrelevant.

2. [Brown] was denied due process when the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Jerome Gatto, Virgil Redmond, Joseph Bonanno, Jr., and Salvatore BonannoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Ubaldo Trevino and Ramiro GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. United States v. Marlon MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James E. Pearson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Devin Jay Hardman v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Ryan Alexander Brown v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API