Ryan Alexander Brown v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice,
[¶1] After being found guilty of conspiracy to commit first-degree murder, Ryan Alexander Brown claims the trial court committed errors when it allowed the State to introduce evidence in the form of a demonstrative video, a bank statement, and W.R.E. 404(b) evidence. We will affirm.
ISSUES
[¶2] Mr. Brown presents three issues for our review:
1. [Brown] was denied due process when the trial court allowed the state to play a video of an explosion of a “pipe bomb” when that video was not timely provided to defense counsel and was irrelevant.
2. [Brown] was denied due process when the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Jerome Gatto, Virgil Redmond, Joseph Bonanno, Jr., and Salvatore BonannoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Ubaldo Trevino and Ramiro GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- United States v. Marlon MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- James E. Pearson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Devin Jay Hardman v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Ryan Alexander Brown v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021