Ratcliffe v. Mahres
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Per curiam
Appellees have filed motion to strike the brief of appellant because it was filed late. The brief was filed October 14, 1938. It should have been filed seven days earlier. Appellees were entitled to have the period elapsing between October 7th and October 29th in which to study the brief of appellant and make reply thereto (Rule 36 governing Courts of Civil Appeals). This is a valuable right and were the circumstances such that it was seriously impaired by appellant’s tardiness., we should unhesitatingly strike the latter’s brief. However, we can save appellees’ rights without doing this.…
2Cited by27 opinions
- DiGiuseppe v. LawlerTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Liedeker v. GrossmanTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Roundville Partners, L.L.C. v. Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Wilson v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Ferguson v. Von SeggernCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.