Legal Opinion

Liedeker v. Grossman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1947No. A-1348PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sharp

This is a suit in equity, brought by Simon Grossman and Edward Grossman, as vendees, against Morris Liedeker, as vendor, for specific performance of a contract to convey land. The National Abstract and Title Company, the escrow agent, was made a party defendant, and answered by way of a stakeholder’s plea. Morris to $1.00 Stores No. 2, Inc. was also made a party defendant because of an alleged leasehold estate in the land which it claimed. Trial was before the court without a jury, and the judgment was rendered that plaintiffs take nothing by *310their suit, and that the escrow agent return the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Burford v. PoundersTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Beer v. LandmanTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. National Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. DavisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  5. First State Bank v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Woodward v. OrtizTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. 17090 Parkway, Ltd. v. McDavid, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  4. Roundville Partners, L.L.C. v. Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  5. Wilson v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API