Legal Opinion

FEFE

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1989No. ID 3121PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3121 MATTER OF FEFE In Exclusion Pi oceedings A 28556£62 - Decided by Board August 1, 1989 (1) An applicant for asylum cannot meet his b irden of proof unless he testifies under oath regarding his application; and, therefc,re, an immigration judge should not proceed to adjudicate a written application for asylum if no oral testimony has been offered in support of that application. (2) At a minimum, the regulations require that an asylum applicant take the stand, be placed under oath, and be questioned as to whether the information in his written application is complete and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MOGARRABIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1987
  2. BALIBUNDIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gil Ilano Colmenar,petitioner v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. C-Y-ZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
  3. S-M-JBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
  4. Dionesio Calunsag Grava v. Immigrationand Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. S-L-LBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API