Legal Opinion

United States v. Julius Jones

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 27, 2019No. 17-2944PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Judge.

A jury convicted Julius Lamon Jones of interference with commerce by threat or violence ("Hobbs Act robbery"), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951 , and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence (COV), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). On appeal, Jones argues that the district court 1 erred in denying his motion for mistrial based on a government witness's response to his counsel's questioning. He also argues that the district court plainly erred in not granting a judgment of acquittal on the ground that his Hobbs Act robbery conviction is not a COV as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Chong LamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Kelley Joseph Legrand, Also Known as CasperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  4. Cody Joseph Diaz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. James Franklin Rounsavall A/K/A Frank RounsavallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Monico DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Marcus WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. George StoneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
  4. Alisic v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  5. Cole v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API