Legal Opinion

Corey v. Burton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1875PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Barrv Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, J:

The circuit court put this case to the jury under instructions, in substance, that an infant who borrows money for a *31business enterprise, and gires a cbattcl 'mortgage to secure tbe payment thereof with interest, cannot disaffirm this contract without restoring the consideration received therefor, which, in this case, would be the money borrowed. The judge appears to hare regarded the mortgage as an executed contract, which was only to be disaffirmed on placing the parties in statu quo.

This view was erroneous. The mortgage, so far as the right to enforce it. by taking .possession…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Minock v. ShortridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Deason v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1833

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Knaggs v. GreenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Ross P. Curtice Co. v. KentNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Sanger v. HibbardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  4. Barr v. Packard Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Salter v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API