Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Horowitz v. Hanley

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application for a writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtCohalan, J.

The relator applies for a writ of habeas corpus. He was indicted by the grand jury of the county of New York in the Court of General Sessions, and on February 26, 1918, an order was made removing the indictment to the Supreme Court. On April 19,1918, at an Extraordinary Trial Term of the Supreme Court the relator entered a plea of guilty, and his bail was continued and sentence adjourned without date. On December 27, 1918, the Appellate Division granted an absolute writ of prohibition, which prevented sentence being passed upon the relator by the Extraordinary Trial Term of the Supreme Court.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moett v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. People ex rel. Childs v. Extraordinary Trial Term of the Supreme CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  4. People v. UllmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Landthrip v. City of BeebeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. People ex rel. Barnes v. Warden of WorkhouseNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Tumbs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API