Landthrip v. City of Beebe
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Chief Justice.
This is a strange case. The purported holder of a purported judicial office is contending that the office was not validly created and that his acts were invalid. Appellant, Taylor Landthrip, who has been acting as Judge of the Police Court of Beebe, brought this action against the City of Beebe for a declaratory judgment as to the legal status of the court of which he purported to be the presiding judge. The city, acting through its Mayor and City Council answered Landthrip’s complaint, alleging that he was elected judge by the voters of the City of Beebe, a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re SantillanesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Burt v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Howell v. Howell Stevens v. StevensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- State ex rel. Bales v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Adams v. LindellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Chronister v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
- Walker v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Farmer v. Edmonds Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Tumbs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.