Minnesota Transfer Railway Co. v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Dissent
I dissent. Sections 241 and 242 of the Saint Paul charter require that, upon approval of the petition for the improvement, but before the final order granting the petition, a public hearing must be had upon the public necessity for, and the feasibility of, the project, at which all interested persons shall be heard. Such hearing is judicial in character. It was had on February 29, 1916. It is conceded that appellant received the post-card notice thereof, but at that time it was not aninterested party. It had no legal right to be heard. We are here dealing with legal propositions, and at the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Sears v. Mayor of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
3Cited by1 opinion
- Minnesota Transfer Railway Co. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925