Legal Opinion

Hollingsworth v. Gleissner

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1926No. 2632PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal bond given by the appellant is insufficient in that the only surety on it is one of the two defendants cast in solido in the judgment appealed from.

“Act 112 of 1916 clearly indicates the procedure by which the insufficiency or incorrectness of bonds of appeal and other bonds shall be tested. It is plain from this statute that such procedure should in all cases arise in the first instance in the trial court.”

Rousseau vs. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co., 2 La. App. 279.

“It is plain, therefore, that if an appellee or any party in interest…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hurry v. HurrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  2. Bilich v. MatheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Rousseau v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. ClaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. Dares v. O'DonnellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API