Legal Opinion

People v. Wright

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1957No. Crim. 3324PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LERNHART, J. pro tem. *

Defendant was charged by information in three counts, one of receiving stolen goods, one of burglary, and one of possession of morphine. On trial to the court without a jury, a jury having been waived, he was found guilty of receiving stolen goods and of possession of narcotics, and not guilty of burglary. Defendant appeals. His only contention is that the trial court erred in receiving as evidence articles he claims to have been procured by illegal search and seizure.

Early in the morning of January 27, 1956, a deputy sheriff attached to the Eden Township Station of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. BlodgettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. State v. RileyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. WillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API