Legal Opinion

Gordon Deitz v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 7, 1956No. 11679_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff who, at the time of his alleged accident, was employed as a seaman in the capacity of an oiler on board the respondent’s vessel “James Fergus.” The libellant has been awarded damages totaling $45,573.72. By separate findings these are divided as follows: for lost wages $573.72; for maintenance $108.00; for loss of future earning power $35,000; and for pain, worry, fear and anxiety $10,000.

In seeking review here, the appellant seems to suggest to us a different view from that we hold about the effect of McAllister v. United…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Brett v. J. M. Carras, Inc. The AlexandraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Otto E. Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  2. Sevigny's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Preston Lee Tyndall v. Conduit and Foundation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. Owen v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1966
  5. Otto E. Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API