Legal Opinion

Preston Lee Tyndall v. Conduit and Foundation Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 31, 1959No. 12875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Chief Judge.

Tyndall brought an admiralty action in personam against his employer, The Conduit and Foundation Corporation, for maintenance and cure and for damages under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688. The trial resulted in an award to Tyndall of $1,760 for maintenance and cure and damages in the amount of $47,500. Conduit has appealed.

The primary issue at bar turns on whether Tyndall was or was not a seaman. If he was a “seaman” at the time he was injured he was entitled to maintain actions for maintenance and cure and for damages under the Jones Act. The Jones Act contains no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Desper v. Starved Rock Ferry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Butler v. WhitemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Mary Harris, Widow of Dupree Butler v. George W. WhitemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  5. Gordon Deitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanford Bros. Boats, Inc. v. Dalvis VidrineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Brinegar v. San Ore Construction CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1969
  3. Madsen v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API