Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Bluel

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 28, 1958No. 11,989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused entered a plea of guilty before a special court-martial to a num-her of charges alleging violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Among the charges is one alleging that he unlawfully carried a “concealed weapon, to wit: An Addresso 15, *68straight razor” at the USO building, Oceanside, California. On review, the board of review held that while a straight razor may be so used as to become a dangerous weapon, it was not “per se” such a weapon and it was not “designed” as one; consequently, it held that the specification failed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. WelkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. WashingtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. United States v. ThompsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. ReamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. BentleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. BriceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. HollandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  3. United States v. TindollUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  4. United States v. GrimmCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  5. United States v. LittleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API