Legal Opinion

McNulty v. Connew

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1875PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Judge of the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

This was a proceeding by habeas corpus, on petition of the appellant against the appellee, as keeper of the city prison of the city of Lafayette.

The question presented is as to the power of a city judge to take and exercise jurisdiction of actions for violations of the city ordinances, and to commit to prison parties found guilty.

On the 2d day of February, 1874, the city council adopted *570and put in force an ordinance declaring that it was deemed expedient, as a matter of economy, that a city judge, for the city, should be elected, and providing, in the first section, that at the general…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. MarkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Shoemaker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Leard v. LeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Howard v. ShoemakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Paine v. ElySupreme Court of Vermont · 1789

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Steinmetz v. G. H. Hammond Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API