Legal Opinion

Monongahela National Bank v. Jacobus

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 19, 1883No. 84PublishedCited by 17 opinions

IN error to the circuit co^jrt of the united states for the WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Proceedings subsequent to judgment against a- person as garnishee, who claimed title to property taken on execution as the defendant’s property. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

delivered the opinion of the court.. The ■ plaintiff in error having recovered a judgment for $9,056.12 against Alfred Patterson, in the Circuit Court of the United States, for the Western District of Pennsylvania, caused an execution attachment to be issued against the Fayette County Bailroad Company and Samuel H. Jacobus, the defendant in error, attaching, as the property of Patterson, certain shares of the capital stock of that company, which stood in the name of Jacobus. The attachment was duly served upon Patterson, Jacobus, and the railroad company. The controlling: issue in the case is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Potter v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Glover v. PattenSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Raymond C. Price and Control Sciences, Inc. v. Lake Sales Supply R.M., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  5. McMullen v. RitchieU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API