Legal Opinion

Kerr v. RICHLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 15, 2009No. 26667PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice KITTREDGE:

This medical malpractice case turns on whether the six-year statute of repose in section 15-3-545(A) of the South Carolina Code (2005) applies to causes of action arising under the Tort Claims Act. We hold that it does and affirm.

I

In 1996, Marta Kerr’s excised mole was allegedly misdiagnosed as benign by a pathologist at Richland Memorial Hospital (Hospital). In 2001, Kerr learned the 1996 specimen, upon reexamination, contained evidence of melanoma. This misdiagnosis allegedly contributed to Kerr’s death in 2002 due to complications of melanoma cancer. Kerr’s estate brought…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Berkebile v. OutenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Capco of Summerville, Inc. v. J.H. Gayle Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Hoffman Ex Rel. Estate of Hoffman v. PowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Harrison v. BevilacquaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Butler v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2010
  2. Johnson v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  3. Lawing v. Trinity Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  4. Heaton v. StirlingDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  5. Heaton v. StirlingDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API