Legal Opinion

Willis v. Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1994No. 92-02361PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. PARKER, District Judge:

Robert E. Willis (“Willis”) filed this action in Texas state court on July 31, 1991, asserting negligence and defamation claims arising out of a test of Willis’s urine that resulted in a false positive for methamphetamines. Willis brought action against Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc. (“Roche”), the laboratory that performed the urinalysis; E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company (“Du Pont”), his employer; and four Du Pont employees, George M. Allison, M.D., Bill Pace, Bill Brin-ghurst, and Martha Kivlovitz. (The Du Pont company and its employees are referred to…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Audi Ag and Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Bob D'amato, D/B/A Quattro EnthusiastsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Cherokee Pump & Equipment Inc. v. Aurora PumpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Willis v. Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. SMS Financial, Ltd. Liability Co. v. ABCO Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. First Commonwealth Corp. v. Hibernia National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API