Legal Opinion
Daboll v. Daboll
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 30, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarvin, J.
On behalf of the surviving child, Ida A. Daboll, it is claimed that the will is merely a direction that the residue of the estate is to be distributed as intestate estate and that any presumption against intestacy does not come into play because the will expressly provides for intestacy; and that any portion not consumed for Elmer’s benefit during his life preserves its original character and is now distributable as intestate estate to the daughter and the legal representatives of the two sons.
On behalf of the widow of Stanley Trott Allyn, it is claimed that-the words “give, devise and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wolfe v. HathewaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Russell v. HartleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Rand v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
- Nicoll v. IrbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Farnam v. FarnamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shannon v. EnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Hill v. WrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Bronson v. PinneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Allen v. TysonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. BrodySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.