Estate of Wells v. Sanford
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
P. A. Hollingsworth, Justice.
The central issue raised in this appeal is whether the assets of a testamentary trust should be used to support a woman who has been declared incompetent before her own assets, as controlled by her guardian, are used.
Nora Wells was declared physically incompetent in 1974 and Elvan G. Sanford, one of the appellees, was appointed her guardian. In 1977, Hiram Wells, Nora Wells’ son, executed his Last Will and Testament. The Will contained the following provisions:
II
If my mother, Nora Wells, is living at the time of my death, then I give, devise, and bequeath my…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moody v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1840
- Armstrong v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Thompson v. DunlapSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Park v. HollomanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Martin v. Simmons First National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bailey v. Delta Trust & BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Godfrey v. ChandleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Morris v. CullipherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Susan Feibelman v. Worthen National Bank, N.A., Susan Feibelman v. Worthen National Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Carmody v. BettsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.