Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Boynton v. City of Kansas

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 3, 1934No. 32,205PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

In this proceeding the state invokes the original jurisdiction of this court in quo warranto, challenging the authority of Kansas City to enter into a contract with a trustee to be approved by the national government whereby the city lets to the Federal Administrator of Public Works a part of its undeveloped municipal *472wharf for $10 per annum and in turn leases from such trustee the same property at a stipulated annual rental of “not less than $25,000 per annum” for an indefinite number of years, such rental to begin on the completion of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Hines v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
  3. State ex rel. Griffith v. Osawkee TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  4. Wulf v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Treadwell v. BeebeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fatzer v. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Wendler v. City of Great BendSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. Ferguson v. City of PittsburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  4. Spence v. UTAH STATE AGR. COLLEGEUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Robertson v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API