Luse v. Beard
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.
Appellee sued A. F. and Mary E. Luse and R. S. Pipkin, appellants. As against A. F. Luse the suit was to reform the indorsement made upon certain notes executed December 1, 1920, by V. G. Schimmel, G. D. Schimmel, and A. C. Stiles, payable to A. F. Luse, indorsed and transferred by Luse to appellee as a part of the consideration of the purchase price for the conveyance to Mary E. Luse to lot No. 21 and the north one-half of lot 20, in block 22 of South Hemphill Heights in the city of Fort Worth, which deed has date December 15, 1920. The suit was also to reform said deed so that it would…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. DayTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Arlington Heights Realty Co. v. Citizens' Ry. & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Howe v. HardingTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Rowe v. Colorado S. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Pullman Company v. Cox, Jr.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Standard v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Rattan v. DickerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Reed v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- First National Bank of Andrews v. Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1982
- Reynolds Mortgage Co. v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.