Legal Opinion
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Day
Texas Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 1911No. 2162PublishedCited by 36 opinions
Questions certified from the Court of Civil Appeals, Fifth District, in an appeal from Ellis County.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey
The certificate from- the Court of Civil Appeals which presents the questions to which an answer in invited is quite lengthy, but can not, in justice to the case, be condensed by us. It is as follows':
“Appellee sued the appellant railway company to recover damages for personal injuries inflicted upon him about the 6tli of August, 1907, by one Jim Milam, a servant of appellant. Both Milam and Day were members of the bridge gang, and it was alleged that Milam was assistant foreman and in authority over Day. A recovery was sought upon the ground that the railway company was negligent in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chapman v. . Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Baltimore Elevator Co. v. NealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Norfolk & Western Railroad v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
- Hilts v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Ry.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. SullivanIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by36 opinions
- Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Dieter v. Baker Service Tools, a Division of Baker International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
- Murray v. Modoc State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Craycroft v. CrawfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Greenlaw v. DilworthTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.