Hunter v. Hunter
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Watts, J., Laurens, Action for removal of trustee and accounting by Eugene S., Samuel M., Stokes, W. Mills, and Lea Hunter against Nannie W. Hunter, A. Y. Thomson, W. T. Blakeley, W. A. McClintock, W. J. Eleming, Robert H. Eleming, S. H. Eleming, Emma S. Eleming, and Mary J. Nabors. The following is the will in question: “The State of South Carolina, Laurens County.
Read the full summary
Before Watts, J., Laurens, Action for removal of trustee and accounting by Eugene S., Samuel M., Stokes, W. Mills, and Lea Hunter against Nannie W. Hunter, A. Y. Thomson, W. T. Blakeley, W. A. McClintock, W. J. Eleming, Robert H. Eleming, S. H. Eleming, Emma S. Eleming, and Mary J. Nabors. The following is the will in question: “The State of South Carolina, Laurens County. I, Samuel M. Hunter, of the county and State aforesaid, do make and ordain this my last will and testament in manner and form as follows, to wit: 1st. I direct my executrix to pay my just debts and funeral expenses, and to…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chiee Justice McIvER.
On the 25th day of April, 1883, S. M. Hunter, having first duly made and executed his last will and testa'tement, departed this life, leaving surviving him his wife, the defendant, Nannie W. Hunter, and his children, who are the plaintiffs in this case. The said Nannie W. Hunter was the duly appointed and qualified executrix of the will of her husband; and as such she made deeds to S. M. Nabors, A„ Y. Thompson and E. J. Fleming, purporting to convey to these pérsons in the different proportions mentioned in the complaint, a…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Folk v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
- Black v. HarmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Black v. HarmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Mobley v. JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916