Legal Opinion

Liner v. Mittelstadt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1950PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

If the question of ownership of the vehicle at the time of the accident is determined the issues are simplified and that question will be considered first. The Uniform Sales Act, ch. 121, Stats., affects transactions of this sort. Portions of that act which the parties deem material are:

“121.18 Property in specific goods passes when parties so intend. (1) Where there is a contract to sell specific or ascertained goods, the property in them is transferred to the buyer at such time as the parties to the contract intend it to be transferred.
“(2) For the purpose of ascertaining the intention of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Necedah Manufacturing Corp. v. Juneau CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Leonard v. BottomleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Suennen v. EvrardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bolton v. ZieglerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
  2. Paape v. Northern Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  3. Knutson v. MuellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Klapps v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Hofslund v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API