Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Murex Petroleum Corporation

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided April 19, 2019No. 1:17-cv-00165Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Adam Peterson, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER RE MOTION vs. ) FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ) AS TO MUREX’S CROSS-CLAIM Murex Petroleum Corporation, ) AGAINST PHOENIX Mickey Peck, company man, ) Stokes and Spiehler, ) Earl Britzenhoff, Company Man, and ) Phoenix Operating Company, ) Case No.1:17-cv-165 ) Defendants, ) ) and ) ) Murex Petroleum Corporation, ) ) Defendant and ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) WISCO, Inc., ) ) Third-Party Defendant. ) I. BACKGROUND In this action, plaintiff Adam Peterson (“Peterson”) is suing to recover…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Weather Shield Mfg., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Tibert v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. UDC-Universal Development, L.P v. CH2M HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Specialized Contracting, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Specialized Contracting, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API