Legal Opinion

Continental Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1988No. Appeals Nos. 598 and 599 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Two telephone utilities, Continental Telephone Company of Pennsylvania and Quaker State Telephone Company, appeal from orders of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC or commission) that approved rate increases for the utilities but allowed them to recover in rates only a portion of the federal tax expenses that they claimed in their rate filings.

The sole issue raised by the utilities on this appeal is whether the PUC erred as a matter of law by recognizing tax savings that they realized because of their participation in a consolidated tax return of their…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Hanover Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Commissioner v. Idaho Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API