Legal Opinion

Denman v. Steinbach

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1902No. 4245PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. William H. Snell, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Tb© opinion of tbe court was delivered by

Mount, J.

Appellant brought tbis action in tbe court below to quiet bis title to certain lots in tbe city of Tacoma. These lots bad been previously, sold for taxes, and cer*180tificates of sale issued to> defendants. A demurrer to- the complaint upon the ground that the: same did not state facts sufficient to- constitute a cause of action was sustained by the court. The plaintiff stood upon the1 allegations of his complaint, and from an order of dismissal this appeal is prosecuted. The complaint alleges, in substance: (1) That plaintiff is the owner of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Packwood v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. City of Port Townsend v. EisenbeisWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Parks v. WatsonUnited States Circuit Court · 1884

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rowland v. EskelandWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Larson v. PeppardMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Childs v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Rothchild Bros. v. RollingerWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Olson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API