Legal Opinion

William P. Marmon v. Railroad Retirement Board

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 27, 1955No. 11434_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LORD, District Judge.

This is a proceeding brought by a former railroad employee seeking an annuity under provisions of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937, as amended, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 228a-228y (1952), hereinafter referred to as the “Act.” The Railroad Retirement Board, hereinafter referred to as the “Board,” held that petitioner was not entitled to receive an annuity. Petitioner has appealed to this Court.

Eligibility for an annuity is based upon the employment status of the applicant as defined in the Act. A person must have been an “employee” on or after August 29, 1935, the enactment date,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Ellers v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. South v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  5. Bruno v. Railroad Retirement BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Staskel v. GardnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Application of BabcockAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Dependents of Cazimero v. KOHALA SUGAR COMPANYHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Correa Suárez v. Junta de Retiro para MaestrosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API