Legal Opinion
Ellers v. Railroad Retirement Board
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 6, 1943No. 72PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
The first question is as to the jurisdiction of the district court. Section 11 of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937, 45 U.S.C.A. § 228k, provides: “An employee or other person aggrieved may apply to the district court of any district wherein the Board may have established an office or to the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia to compel the Board (1) to set aside an action or decision of the Board claimed to be in violation of a legal right of the applicant or (2) to take action or to make a decision necessary for the enforcement of a legal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Utah Copper Co. v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- John Bene & Sons, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- John W. McGrath Corp. v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Stanley Laboratories, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Staskel v. GardnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Duquesne Warehouse Co. v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Squires v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.