Legal Opinion
People v. Harrell
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*804OPINION OF THE COURT
Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J.
The defendants are charged with robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree. Their omnibus motions requested Wade hearings arguing that the identifications of them made by the two complainants were suggestive. Witnesses at the hearing were Detective Thomas Casey and the complainant, Joakima Artis. The People were given the opportunity to call the eyewitness, llene Brown, but she did not appear in court and the hearing was…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. GeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. KavanaughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994