Legal Opinion
Patrick Thomas,petitioners v. National Labor Relations Board, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 95, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 9, 2000No. 99-1338PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
213 F.3d 651 (D.C. Cir. 2000)
Patrick Thomas, et al.,Petitioners
v.
National Labor Relations Board, Respondent
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 95, et al., Intervenors
No. 99-1338 Consolidated with 99-1378
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Argued May 8, 2000
Decided June 9, 2000
On Petitions for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board
Glenn M. Taubman argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was W. James Young.
Fred B. Jacob, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- At&T Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000