Legal Opinion

In Re Reed

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 1, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The Censor Committee, created by Rule 62 of this Court, has recommended that disciplinary action be taken against Paul R. Reed, a member of the Delaware Bar (Respondent) upon the basis of the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

Findings of Fact

“1. The following allegations of paragraphs 2A, B, D, and E of the Order to Show Cause herein were stipulated to be true by Respondent Paul R. Reed at the hearing herein, and the balance of the allegations of paragraph 2B were withdrawn:
“(a) As agent for Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, Respondent issued a title insurance policy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re MorfordSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951
  2. Matter of ReedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  3. Matter of ReardonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  4. In re AutmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of ReedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  2. In Re FrabizzioSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  3. In Re ReedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  4. In Re ClarkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API