Legal Opinion

United States v. Leroy Carlton Knotts and Darryl Petschen

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 30, 1981No. 80-1952, 80-1953PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

Leroy Knotts and Darryl Petschen appeal from their convictions of conspiring to manufacture controlled substances. The principal issue on appeal concerns the admissibility of evidence obtained through use of a signal transmitter (“beeper”) placed by police agents in a can of chloroform purchased by a co-conspirator of the appellants’. Knotts and Petschen argue that the war-rantless use of this beeper violated their Fourth Amendment rights, and that the evidence obtained through tracking the beeper should have been excluded by the district court.

Knotts and Petschen…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Leonard Joel DubrofskyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. KnottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Kevin Sweeney, Daniel Hughes and Robert Ellington, and United States of America v. Daniel M. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Larry VentlingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. James Connors Karo, Richard Miles Horton, William Robertson Harley, Michael Gaylord Steele, Evan Roth, Gene R. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Gene C. Braithwaite, and Michael L. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API