Legal Opinion

In the Interest of J.S.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 12, 2009No. 101,777PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rulon, C.J.:

A.A. appeals the district court’s termination of her parental rights to her children, J.S. (d/o/b 2002), K.S. (d/o/b 2003), A.A.-S. (d/o/b 2005), S.D. (d/o/b 2006), and C.D., IV (d/o/b 2007). We conclude that a rational factfinder could have found it highly *114probable, i.e., by clear and convincing evidence, that mother’s parental rights should be terminated and that termination was in the children’s best interests. We affirm.

In October 2006, CINC proceedings were initiated for the four older children. The petition alleged that mother and C.D., the natural father of S.D. (and later…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Miller v. BartleSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. In the Interest of J.L.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  4. In re the Marriage of BradleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. In the Interest of B.E.Y.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In The Interest Of K.R.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  2. In Re JSCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API