United States v. Pedro Acuna-Ramirez

PER CURIAM: *

As Pedro Enrique Acuna-Ramirez (“Acuna”) did not preserve his objection to the district court’s determination that his prior conviction qualified as an aggravated felony, his claim is subject to plain error review. United States v. Castaneda-Lozoya, 812 F.3d 457, 459 (5th Cir. 2016) (“If an argument is raised for the first time on appeal, we review for plain error.”). “Under plain-error review, this court may correct a forfeited error in its ‘sound discretion’ on a showing of (1) an error (2) that is clear or obvious, (3) that affects substantial rights, and (4) that seriously…