Legal Opinion
In re Tantillo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 22, 1990Published
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the petitioner from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County (Signorelli, S.), dated September 28, 1988.
Ordered that the decree is affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Imperato, 44 Mise 2d 639, revd 24 AD2d 598, revd 18 NY2d 825, for reasons stated by Surrogate Hildreth; Matter of Rutherford, 125 AD2d 312; Matter of Kronen, 114 AD2d 1033, affd 67 NY2d 587). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Estate of KronenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re the Estate of ImperatoNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- In re the Estate of RutherfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re the Estate of KronenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re the Estate of ImperatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965