Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Imperato

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1966PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed and decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County, reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division to both parties payable out of the estate. The dis-positive provisions of the will were limited by the conditions set forth in the fourth paragraph thereof. Accordingly, the determination of the Surrogate is reinstated for the reasons stated in his opinion (44 Misc 2d 639).

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van VooRhis, Bubice, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of ImperatoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of KronenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In re the Estate of RutherfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. In re the Estate of KronenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Margulis v. TeichmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1984
  5. In re CincottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API