Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Doe

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 18, 2013No. A13A0963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, Chief Judge.

In this case, a 17-year-old girl petitioned a juvenile court under the Parental Notification Act (“the Act”), OCGA § 15-11-110 et seq., for a waiver of the parental notification required before an unemancipated minor may have an abortion. See OCGA §§ 15-11-112 (b); 15-11-114 (c). The juvenile court held a hearing and thereafter issued *575an order denying the petition. The appellant filed the instant appeal.1 Because we find that the appellant was entitled to a waiver of the notification requirement for the reasons explained below, we reverse.

Generally, the Act prohibits…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Hammock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  3. In Re Jane DoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  4. In the Interest of J. N.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. In the Interest of D. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API