State v. Nobles
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Justice.
Appeal by the State
The State’s appeal has brought to the Court a question as to whether certain aggravating factors were properly found. We note at the outset that the State petitioned for discretionary review as to only the first two aggravating factors which the Court of Appeals held it was error to find. The State did not petition for a review of the third aggravating factor which the Court of Appeals held was erroneously found. This holding by the Court of Appeals is not disturbed. We shall discuss the other aggravating factors with which the Court of Appeals dealt.
The first…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. MeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Galaviz-TorresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. Galaviz-TorresCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
- State v. PedersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020