Legal Opinion

State v. Nobles

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1991No. 342PA90PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

Appeal by the State

The State’s appeal has brought to the Court a question as to whether certain aggravating factors were properly found. We note at the outset that the State petitioned for discretionary review as to only the first two aggravating factors which the Court of Appeals held it was error to find. The State did not petition for a review of the third aggravating factor which the Court of Appeals held was erroneously found. This holding by the Court of Appeals is not disturbed. We shall discuss the other aggravating factors with which the Court of Appeals dealt.

The first…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. MeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Galaviz-TorresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. Galaviz-TorresCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
  5. State v. PedersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API