State v. Houey
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Justice PLEICONES:
Ronte Houey (Appellant) was charged with second-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor (CSCM). The solicitor moved pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 16-3-740(B) (2003) for an *109order requiring Appellant to submit to testing for HIV and other diseases. The circuit court ordered the testing, and we affirm.
FACTS
After Appellant was arrested and charged with second-degree CSCM, the solicitor, at the request of the victim’s legal guardian, moved for an order requiring Appellant to submit to HIV and other STD testing pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 16-S^OCB).1 Appellant opposed the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Chandler v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. LeggSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- State v. CountsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- State v. NeumanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- State v. HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- State v. BemerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.