Commonwealth v. Quinn

After a mistrial, the defendant, Kevin Quinn, was retried before a jury and the same Superior Court judge and was *760convicted of forcible rape of a child and two counts of indecent assault and battery on a child. On appeal, the defendant argues, first, that the prosecutor’s cross-examination of the victim’s therapist exceeded the permissible bounds of expert testimony; and second, that it was error to exclude evidence that the victim was pregnant when she made her first complaint of sexual assault by the defendant. We affirm.

Factual background. We summarize the facts the jury could reasonably…