Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Steinhaus
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 3, 1987No. C8-86-714Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
This appeal arises from an insurance coverage dispute in a declaratory judgment action. Robert Steinhaus suffered severe injuries when a car driven by his wife Lori Frederickson collided with a tow truck. After the accident, Steinhaus filed a claim against Frederickson’s insurer, State Farm Insurance Company. State Farm refused to honor the claim because the policy coverages had been suspended. The jury in the ensuing declaratory judgment action returned a verdict for State Farm, and Stein-haus appeals. We affirm the jury’s finding of no coverage.
FACTS
On November 20,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Paul Boyd, United States of America v. Danilo Zabala Artez A/K/A Chico Artez, United States of America v. George ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Nadeau v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Quaderer v. Integrity Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State v. SchluterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- United States v. National Insurance UnderwritersDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.