Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul Boyd, United States of America v. Danilo Zabala Artez A/K/A Chico Artez, United States of America v. George Clark
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 19, 1980No. 79-1482, 79-1492 and 79-1554PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Danilo Artez and Paul Boyd appeal from their convictions by a jury and defendant George Clark appeals from the district court’s 1 denial of a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty. The appeals have been consolidated. We affirm the convictions of Artez and Boyd, and the denial of Clark’s motion.
On January 12,1979, a federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment against defendants Danilo Zabala Artez a/k/a Chi-co Artez, George Clark, Marquetta Hays, Paul Boyd, and Wilbert Farrell Ratliff a/k/a Jimmy Taylor. The indictment charged the defendants had…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Schaffer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. James PanebiancoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Stephen G. Scholle, United States of America v. Michael S. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Michael McCray v. Robert AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. ReadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Marisa Lemm, United States of America v. Phyllis Ellen Stonys, United States of America v. Val Bolton MagheeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.