Legal Opinion

Thibert v. Milka

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 13, 1995PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

At issue is whether a cause of action exists under the wrongful death statute, G. L. c. 229, § 2 (1992 ed.), on behalf of a nonviable fetus that is not born alive. On March 9, 1989, a backhoe slid off a truck operated by the defendant, William Milka,2 and collided with an automobile driven by the plaintiff’s wife, in which the plaintiff, Christopher N. Thibert, was a passenger. The plaintiff suffered injuries, and his wife, and her unborn baby, Baby Girl Thibert, were killed. Baby Girl Thibert had a gestational age of six*694teen weeks, was not viable,3 and had never lived apart from her mother..…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Dietrich v. Inhabitants of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Porter v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Mone v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Humes v. ClintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bolin v. WingertIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Klairmont v. Gainsboro Restaurant, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Remy v. MacDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Matsuyama v. BirnbaumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  5. McIntyre v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API