Legal Opinion
McComb v. Ross
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 12, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-0157PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Ricky McComb has brought this action against several officers of the Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) and the District of Columbia (“the District”), claiming he was subjected to an unlawful body cavity search in violation of the Fourth Amendment and the laws of the District of Columbia. Before the Court is McComb’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Also before the Court is the District’s motion for leave to file a surreply in response to plaintiffs motion for leave to amend. For the reasons…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. AwadallahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Estate of Chad Alexander Burnett v. City of Colorado SpringsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Lockett v. Metropolitan Police Department of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Masimo Corporation v. Sotera WirelessDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Naranjo v. VictorDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.