Legal Opinion

Puckett v. Bruce

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 11, 2003No. 88,930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

William Puckett, an inmate within the custody of the Kansas Department of Corrections (DOC), filed this K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 60-1501 habeas corpus action alleging that the DOC could not collect restitution from his inmate account while he was in custody. The district court held that the DOC could collect restitution from Puckett’s inmate account with the exception of $10 per month. The DOC appealed, and Puckett cross-appealed. We transferred the case from the Court of Appeals pursuant to K.S.A. 20-3018(c).

On January 22, 2001, Puckett escaped…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. State v. EnglesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. State v. HunzikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. State v. LopezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  5. State v. ChilcoteCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PostSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. State v. AldersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. State v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  4. State v. RobardsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003
  5. State v. PostCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API