Legal Opinion

State v. Chilcote

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 9, 1982No. 53,317PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Meyer, J.:

This case involves an elaborate hoax perpetrated by means of a faked robbery of the Hudson Oil Company Station No. 7 at Wichita, Kansas. Criminal charges were brought against Oliver E. Chilcote (appellant) and others; trial was to the court sitting without a jury. Appellant appeals from his conviction and sentence for felony theft.

Appellant’s first claim of error is that the trial judge assumed a prosecutorial role in the proceedings and thereby denied appellant a fair trial.

In State v. Stoops, 4 Kan. App. 2d 130, 132, 603 P.2d 221 (1979), this court stated:

“Standards of conduct for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. State v. Wilson & WentworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. DubishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  2. State v. McNaughtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  3. State v. BowersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986
  5. State v. PostSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API