Mill v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
The petitioner, Rosemary Mill, seeks review of a decision of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) which adopted the order of an administrative law *599judge requiring her to make full payment of her monthly electric bills, plus $15 per month installments on past unpaid amounts. The order resulted after a hearing on her complaint that the Philadelphia Electric Company’s threats to terminate electrical service to her residence1 should be postponed under PUC regulations. 52 Pa. Code §§56.111-56.118. She alleges that a physician had certified that an occupant of her home suffered…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barr v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3Cited by6 opinions
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Gas v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Jackson v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Teltron, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.